ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
The Program Committee will encourage proposals that reflect diverse viewpoints with respect to ethnicity, culture, language, gender and age.
The Program Committee welcomes proposals about any type of disability (motor, organic, neurological, cognitive, intellectual, visual, auditory, speech and language, learning disability, mental health and chronic disease).
Unpublished summaries presenting innovative ideas and new points of view are preferred. Summaries must be written in plain language, thereby avoiding expressions or highly technical terms.
To simplify the evaluation of the proposals, the Program Committee recommends using the following presentation models.
For scientific presentations |
1. Topic
- Innovative elements, originality
- Potential international reach
- Relevance to Congress themes
2. Text clarity
3. Content quality and comprehensiveness
- Objectives
- Theoretical framework
- Methods, techniques or information-gathering methods; data or information sources, analysis
- Outcomes, conclusions
4. Accessibility and relevance of the requested presentation format
5. Absence of a financial interest in or affiliation with an organization or institution whose products are discussed during the Congress
6. Impact on or potential contribution to scientific expertise
|
For projects |
1. Topics
- Innovative elements, originality
- Potential international reach
- Relevance to Congress themes
2. Text clarity
3. Content quality and comprehensiveness
- Purposes
- Perspectives
- Procedures, steps
- Outcomes, conclusions or points of view
4. Accessibility and relevance of the requested presentation format
5. Absence of a financial interest in or affiliation with an organization or institution whose products are discussed during the Congress
6. Impact on or potential contribution to to rights or to the subject being on the political agenda
|
For personal testimonies |
1. Topics
- Innovative elements, originality
- Potential international reach
- Relevance to Congress themes
2. Text clarity
3. Content quality and comprehensiveness
- Purposes
- Perspectives
- Procedures, steps
- Outcomes, conclusions or points of view
4. Accessibility and relevance of the requested presentation format
5. Absence of a financial interest in or affiliation with an organization or institution whose products are discussed during the Congress
6. Impact on or potential contribution to to rights or to the subject being on the political agenda
|
|
